There is absolutely no need to revoke Section 230. If certain social media platforms wish to be arbiters of truth, then they do not get the protection afforded to them under Section 230. It does not have to be any more complicated than that.
CL
https://www.theverge.com/21273768/section-230-explained-internet-speech-law-definition-guide-free-moderation
REMINDER
Here is an unequivocal fact that has been begrudgingly verified, and can not be denied:
There was never any evidence to suggest that the vaccines would prevent people from getting or spreading Covid-19. Which completely destroys any reason or argument in favor of vaccine mandates or passports. There was zero science involved. It was all about promoting fear and control.
I will be Live streaming tomorrow, Saturday, February 10th at 12pm Eastern time about the illusion of freedom that surrounds us. You can watch it on all these platforms.
Forget the Matrix, we're living on the modern day Jones Plantation
Rumble
Check out yesterday's Live stream to learn my thoughts regarding the latest desperate attempt by the establishment to maintain their grip on power. #RussiagateRedux #PierrePutin #Russian
On Rumble -
Join my Live stream tomorrow (Saturday), August 31 at 1pm Eastern Time
Justice Denied, political prosecution redux, hate speech arrest, and more - The Liberty Angle
Links
Rumble - https://rumble.com/v5d0jp5-justice-denied-political...
X - https://x.com/Can_Libertarian
Offensive speech of any kind is precisely what the concept of free speech is suppose to protect.
Link to article https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2024/08/17/bc-woman-arrested-racially-offensive-social-media/
